Is Your “Blanket” Purchase Order Enforceable?

Jared L. Lefevre, Mark W. Sandretto and Charles E. Hatch III
8/1/23

Woman checking inventory using clipboard in an industrial setting.In the commercial supply chain, particularly in the automotive sector, it is typical for buyers to issue “blanket” purchase orders to sellers, who then fulfill the blanket purchase orders via “releases” of specified quantities of goods from the buyer. Historically, Michigan courts have treated a blanket purchase order as an order for the buyer’s “requirements” to render it an enforceable agreement under the Statute of Frauds, which requires a contract for the sale of goods to have a specified quantity.  Not so anymore.           

In MSSC, Inc. v. Airboss Flexible Products, Co., the Michigan Supreme Court overruled longstanding precedent to hold that a blanket purchase order, without more, is not necessarily an enforceable requirements contract. Rather, a blanket purchase order without a quantity term merely establishes a “release by release” arrangement between the parties, where the seller is free to accept or reject releases under the purchase order and cannot be forced to perform.  As a result, the Tier 2 automotive supplier in that case was relieved of any obligation to fulfill releases issued by its Tier 1 counterparty in connection with a blanket purchase order under which the parties had been performing for years.

This decision is likely to have a significant impact in the automotive sector and other commercial supply chains, as it will cast doubt on the enforceability of longstanding relationships between numerous parties. With fluctuating material prices, rising labor costs and other price pressures, suppliers might rely on this decision to reject releases, avoid performance or renegotiate terms.

Jared J. Lefevre, Mark W. Sandretto and Charles E. Hatch III are commercial litigators based in Toledo, Ohio, each of whom are licensed in Michigan and regularly represent clients in that state. If you have questions about how this decision may impact your business or contracts, please contact them for more information.  

____________________________

   Disclaimer: This alert has been prepared by Eastman & Smith Ltd. for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney/client relationship.

Eastman & Smith LTD. Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek